Independent standards body for AI governance

Prove your AI is governed, before anyone asks.

When a client questionnaire, a vendor review, or a regulator asks how your AI is governed, you answer with a document, not a meeting. An independent, evidence-based review, scored out of 100, delivered as a board-ready AI Trust File™ in 5 to 20 days.

Think of it as a SOC 2 for AI: an independent trust mark for how you govern the AI you build and use. Not an accredited audit, and we say so plainly.

Adapted to the laws and standards of your jurisdiction EU AI Act* ISO/IEC 42001* NIST AI RMF* GDPR* Law 25* LFPDPPP*
Where the questions come from

Named obligations, by jurisdiction.

European Union

Article 50 transparency applies since 2 August 2026 to customer-facing AI reaching EU users, wherever the company sits. Marking of synthetic content for systems already on the market is due 2 December 2026.

United States

No federal AI statute. The pressure is private: security questionnaires, led by SIG 2026, added AI governance sections, generative-AI exclusion endorsements took effect in January 2026, and New York City requires an annual independent bias audit of automated hiring tools.

Canada and Quebec

OSFI Guideline E-23 has banks and insurers examining their vendors' AI governance ahead of 1 May 2027. Quebec's Law 25, article 12.1, requires disclosure of automated decisions, with administrative penalties to $10M or 2%.

Mexico

No general AI law, and obligations anyway: algorithmic management duties for digital platforms since June 2025, written consent for AI voice and image cloning since May 2026, and a right to oppose significant automated decisions under the 2025 data protection law.

Research summaries with dates, not legal advice. A review documents your governance; the evidence answers whoever is asking.

Don’t take our word for it. Read one.

Every review produces an evidence record a board, regulator, or buyer can actually use. It shows what was reviewed, what was verified, what could not be verified, what gaps remain, and the actions to take next. Findings are cited to specific evidence. Scores never exceed their maximum.

Read the sample AI Trust File™ →
The result

A score, not a verdict.

Quiet AI does not pass or fail anyone. Every review returns a score out of 100 that reflects one thing: the strength of the governance we found in the evidence. The tier you commission sets how deeply we look. The two are reported separately, and neither is for sale.

82/100
The independent result
×
Gold
The depth you chose
The standard

Four pillars. One hundred points.

The Quiet AI Standard evaluates governance across four pillars, scored on a transparent 100-point scale. The framework is published, so you can judge our rigor for yourself.

I

Data integrity

25 points · provenance, consent, and lawful use of what goes in
II

Human infrastructure

25 points · named accountability, authority to intervene, oversight
III

Experience & transparency

25 points · disclosure to those affected, explanation, recourse
IV

Privacy & security

25 points · retention, access, and protection of what is held
Strength: documented, operational, well evidenced
Partial: exists but incomplete or in draft
Gap: material, recorded and scored conservatively
How it works

A disciplined review, start to finish.

Step one

Apply

Create an account, confirm your organization, and select a review level matched to your size and risk.

Step two

Submit

Answer the structured intake on your AI systems. Higher levels add document review and public-source verification.

Step three

Review

An AI-assisted, reviewer-signed analysis scores each pillar against evidence. Drafted, challenged, and verified.

Step four

Receive

Your board-ready AI Trust File™, a verifiable result on the public registry, and the badge, in 5 to 20 days.

Review levels

Choose your depth of review.

The tier you select sets how deeply we examine your AI governance. It is what you commission, not a grade. Each level builds on the one below it.

Listed
Registry listing
$790 · 5 days
Silver
Scores your attestation
$3,500 · 7 days
Gold ◆
Adds public-source verification
$9,900 · 10 days
Platinum
Adds document & evidence review
$24,000 · 15 days
Diamond
Adds continuous monitoring
$70,000 · 20 days +

Gold is the flagship. Deeper tiers examine more evidence. They are not a higher bar to clear. Fees are published in USD; every result is valid for twelve months, with renewal fees in the full fee schedule. The founding cohort is open: the first five organizations in the registry receive Platinum-depth examination at the Gold fee.

Under $2M USDAny level
$2M to $20M USDGold or Platinum
$20M USD and abovePlatinum or Diamond
A verifiable result

Proof that holds up, today and years from now.

When your review is complete, the result becomes a permanent, independently verifiable record, bound to your domain and anchored on a public ledger so that no one, not even us, can quietly alter it.

Review completed
Sealed on-chain, time-stamped
Publicly verifiable, bound to your domain

Time-stamped

It captures exactly where your governance stood on the day it was reviewed.

Independently verifiable

A customer, investor, or regulator can confirm it themselves. No wallet or crypto knowledge needed.

Permanent record

If a question ever arises, past or future, you can always prove when you were reviewed by Quiet AI.

Why it pays for itself

A fraction of what it protects.

The deals that matter increasingly come with a question attached: can you show your AI is governed? When the answer is silence, contracts stall, vendor reviews fail, and tenders go to competitors who came prepared.

Procurement and tenders

AI-governance evidence is moving from nice-to-have to prerequisite. A documented result keeps you eligible.

Vendor and security review

Your customer's risk team will ask how your AI is governed. Answer with a file, not a fire drill.

Investor due diligence

A clean, independent result reads as operational maturity, and removes a question from the room.

For the executive accountable for AI, it is documented diligence: evidence that you acted before anyone asked you to.

What you receive

Evidence you can hold.

The AI Trust File™

A board-ready evidence record. Every pillar scored against verified evidence, every gap named, with the steps to close it.

A verifiable token

Your result, sealed on-chain and published in the public registry. Tamper-proof and time-stamped.

The mark

A digital badge for your site. At Platinum, an engraved badge and framed result; at Diamond, a crystal mark.

Your Trust Center

A branded page that shows the world how you govern AI. Built for you, or monitored if you already have one.

From the first page to the object on your shelf, the result is made to be shown.

Trust Center

A home for your governance story.

A Trust Center is a single branded page that answers, for any customer or investor, how your organization governs AI. We offer it at every level, matched to where you are.

Silver and Gold

Your Trust Center

Most organizations at this level have no Trust Center yet. We build yours, worded to reflect your level of verification.

Platinum and Diamond

Your Trust Center

Larger organizations often already have one. We review it and keep it current, with verified Quiet AI results.

The mark

Once reviewed, the seal is yours to show.

Organizations that complete a review may display the Quiet AI mark on their site, materials, and proposals, governed by our trademark usage terms. Each level carries its own seal.

Silver
Gold
Platinum
Diamond
Governance

An institution, not an opinion.

Quiet AI is a private standards body. Reviews are produced by a diagnostic engine and signed by the Quiet AI Standards Committee. Every flagged finding, every material omission, and every result is reviewed before a file is issued.

We are deliberately precise about what a review is, and what it is not. A Quiet AI result documents governance practices aligned with referenced frameworks. It is not legal advice, regulatory compliance certification, or a guarantee against enforcement. That discipline is the point.

Office of the Lead ReviewerQuiet AI Standards Committee

Begin a review.

Tell us about your organization and your AI systems. We confirm your level, issue an institutional invoice, and begin.